Struggling with Jesus calling Gentiles dogs in Mark 7:27

Discussion · 17

Opinions are anonymous retellings of real comments from the original discussion. The same colour marks the same participant.

Log in Log in or sign up to join the discussion.

• − opinion#3104 39 likes at the source

  The Greek word Jesus uses here isn't for wild street dogs (kyon), but kynaria household puppies under the table. He's painting a domestic picture, not hurling an insult, and she matches His wit with deep humility ("even the dogs eat the crumbs"). He uses the moment to honor her amazing faith and throw the door wide open for the Gentiles. Fair enough to wrestle with this text, but it's actually one of the loveliest exchanges in the Gospels. Hope that helps

  • − opinion#3116 61 likes at the source

    The popular explanation you got (the "kynaria means cute pet puppies, so it wasn't an insult" argument) often rings hollow because it treats the scene like a linguistic technicality. Even if kynaria is a diminutive domestic term, being told you belong under the table waiting for scraps still sounds harsh on the surface. In the Second Temple/Lord of Spirits worldview, geography is spiritual. Tyre and Sidon were the heartland of ancient Phoenicia, the exact epicenter of Canaanite Baal worship (the ancestral home of Queen Jezebel). Mark explicitly notes she is a Syrophoenician woman, and Matthew's parallel calls her a Canaanite. In biblical theology, the Canaanites were the prototypical pagan adversaries who offered child sacrifices to territorial spirits and demons. Mark notes that her daughter is possessed by an unclean spirit. The woman's gods have failed her; in fact, the spiritual powers of her region have enslaved her daughter! Jesus walked directly into hostile spiritual territory. He was not cornered, He staged this encounter on her turf. The word that unlocks the whole saying in Mark is often missed: **"first" (prōton).** >"Let the children be fed **first**, for it is not right to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs." Jesus does not say the Gentiles will never eat; He says there is a prophetic divine order. Paul echoes this exact principle throughout his…

    • − opinion#3118 3 likes at the source

      Isn't this why St. Christopher was originally shown with a dog's head?
    • − opinion#3119 3 likes at the source

      Your explanation went way beyond what mine would have been. Mine would've been like a cliff notes version lol But I'm so glad you nailed this on the head because I see how this verse gets misconstrued sometimes. I take myself as an example. When I first came to Christ I didn't understand what the verse actually meant. I was hurt and angry thinking the Lord thought of us as nothing more than a pet that wasn't deserving of anything but what fell under the table. I even cried about it and yelled at Him lol (still a baby drinking milk) The more I read the scriptures the more understanding was given to me and I saw how 'young' I still was in my faith. It's good to have people who can walk fresh believers through tough verses like this to clear up any confusion. I feel like many people miss that the "children" ARE Israel. Luckily, I'm a keen student with an itch for studying, so naturally I started making connections between scripture verses. If people could do the same it might help them tremendously. Bravo for your thorough analysis and explanation! 👏🏼
    • − opinion#3120 1 likes at the source

      this is great, thanks for typing it all out and sharing it
• − opinion#3105 6 likes at the source

  Don't worry that the pagans of the past get such an epithet - we now have the status of Israel.
• − opinion#3106 6 likes at the source

  We're all really dogs under the table

  • − opinion#3117 6 likes at the source

    Indeed I think St John Chrysostom says this, she represents us gentiles
• − opinion#3108 6 likes at the source

  This is one of my favorite verses because it really shows how the Bible has a deeper layer than just the surface text. Only two men in the original Exodus group are granted entry into the Promised Land: Joshua and Caleb. Caleb was not a Hebrew. He was a Kennizite who had left with them from Egypt and whose name literally meant "dog". Before the Canaanite woman, you see this dog language again with Gideon when he is told to take the soldiers who have a posture like a dog. (Caleb's bravery and loyalty) And again in Tobit, when his dog (faithful companion) follows him and Raphael. So when Jesus asks the woman if it's right to give crumbs to the dogs, He's referencing Caleb, and He knows the answer already: Yes, Caleb was one of two men allowed entry because the Promise Land is not about race but about heart. In fact, the land that Caleb inherited in the Promised Land was in Canaan, and Matthew identifies the woman as being from the exact land that Caleb went to claim. It's a bit like a riddle or a passcode. So she isn't offended because she knows Jesus means Caleb, and she knows the answer is yes. And Jesus is of course delighted by her faith and her knowledge of God's Word.
• − opinion#3107 5 likes at the source

  I know this isn't the answer to your question but I love this story and what St Ephrem says "She was crying out \[as\] she was following after him, "Have mercy on me." But he did not reply to her. **The silence of our Lord elicited an even deeper cry by the Canaanite woman.** He who was spurned by Israel spurned her by his silence, but she did not give up. Though neglected, she did not hold back. On the contrary, **she again humbled herself** **and again magnified Israel**, by \[her words\], "Even the dogs eat from their masters' \[crumbs\]," as though the Jews were masters of the Gentiles. His disciples therefore drew near and begged him to send her away. … **She was not ashamed**, to her own benefit, of the name of dogs. Therefore \[he said\], "**Great is your faith, O woman**." " To help with study get the Orthodox Study Bible which includes notes and commentary from Saints. You can also download Cantena app it includes commentary also just filter for Orthodox saints as it may include some post schism. Check the commentary under the same story in Matthew also.
• − opinion#3110 4 likes at the source

  Notice that Christ doesn't even call her a dog. It's just that she corresponds to a dog ***in the analogy***
• − opinion#3109 3 likes at the source

  What exactly seems wrong here? Of course Christ at this point prioritises the Jews unless they push Him away, they're God's people, who worshipped Him and to whom God made His promises. Why wouldn't He be loyal to His people?
• − opinion#3112 3 likes at the source

  It was an illustration, not Jesus calling Gentiles dogs. The woman asked for something that it was not yet time for the Gentiles to receive. "Let the children be fed *first*...[and by implication, the dogs later]." The woman notes that even the little dogs clean up around the children while they eat, ahead of their normally appointed time. Jesus came to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and ministry was based among them; it is the disciples who, at Christ's command, carry his ministry to all. A few verses later, Christ states, "The time will come..." when the "Jews first" policy comes to an end, and he sends his disciples everywhere, Judea, Samaria (the non-Jews), and all the earth. Nonetheless, Jesus fulfilled her request, as our good and merciful and benevolent God.
• − opinion#3111 2 likes at the source

  In addition to Saint Ephrem the Syrian's read on the passage (mentioned by another commenter), I was also moved by how a Jewish reader I watched reacted to that passage; she explained something about how Jewish people relate to (and test) Gentiles that gave me a context for this particular Gospel moment that I hadn't considered.
• − opinion#3113 2 likes at the source

  Christ likens the Gentile woman to a dog because the Gentiles of that time led impure lives and consumed the blood of pagan sacrifices. Every time Christ responds to her, Christ is revealing the woman's wisdom and faith being greater than the peoples faith He was originally sent to, because he says he was sent to "the Lost Sheep of the house of Israel" that lost sheep being the few to accept him while the majority of the house of Israel would reject Christ. Which is why Christ tells her "O woman, great is your faith. Let it be to you as you desire." You can find this explanation in the Commentary on the Gospel by Saint Theophylact of Ohrid
• − opinion#3114 2 likes at the source

  Some of the fathers (this isn't a universal view and I don't want it taken as one) held that the Old Testament was meant to prepare the Jews to receive the Logos from within, while Greek philosophy prepared the Gentiles to receive the Logos from without. So a non-Jew wasn't supposed to keep Old Testament law, and their reception of the Gospel wasn't the same thing. Dogs and kids both need feeding, but you don't prepare their food the same way.
• − opinion#3115 2 likes at the source

  Friend, I converted and was baptized a bit over 2.5 years ago. I'm definitely not as theologically sharp as a lot of people, but I've come to see that Scripture usually has many layers of context and meaning. Here my first guess would be that Jesus is just testing the woman, not implying Jews are somehow above Gentiles. That said, in Acts we do see the apostles preaching in the synagogues first before going to the gentiles.