WeOrthodox
EN UA
Eastern Orthodoxy Daily He/Who/Is with MaximosPTO Instagram

True conversion demands deep study, not single issues

The post begins with a blunt critique of people who treat conversion to Orthodoxy as a reaction to a single doctrinal disagreement, such as the mode of baptism or the principle of sola scriptura. The author observes that many modern Protestants already hold views similar to the historic Orthodox position on baptism, so adopting that view does not by itself justify leaving a Protestant community.

The author also mocks the vague label "Christ follower" and the lack of urgency in discovering what that title actually entails, noting the inconsistency of accepting the Eucharist while rejecting the Church that defines it. The author also questions the "GCR social gospel" regardless of good intentions, and calls for the Lord's mercy.

The accompanying video summary expands on these themes. The speaker argues that comments about conversion are often ill-informed because people "jump ship without knowing the ship they are jumping into." They insist that converting over one conviction is not enough and recommend reading "Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future" as a starting point for understanding the differences between traditions.

The speaker emphasizes that the Eucharist cannot be celebrated in any home or informal gathering, contrary to some evangelical podcast claims. True seeking, they say, requires removing bias, putting truth above comfort and relationships, and engaging deeply with patristic and contemporary Orthodox writings. When these sources are read without prejudice, a single concept can shatter an entire worldview.

The discussion that follows centers on the necessity of thorough study before conversion, the danger of picking and choosing beliefs, and the priority of truth over personal preference. The video points list eight specific observations, each reinforcing the central argument that conversion must be grounded in comprehensive study and a willingness to have one's paradigm broken.

Key moments

  1. Comments about conversion are sometimes the dumbest because people jump ship without knowing the ship they are jumping into.
  2. Converting over one conviction is not enough; changing a view on baptism does not require abandoning Protestant beliefs since many Protestants hold that view.
  3. You need to read Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future and learn about the other traditions before deciding.
  4. Contrary to common evangelical podcast belief, you cannot just have the Eucharist in any home or per synagoga.
  5. Truly seeking means challenging your beliefs and reading the abundant resources available, patristics, contemporary saints, and historic Orthodox perspectives.
  6. When reading these sources without bias, you may find contradictions that destroy your paradigm.
  7. All it takes is one concept to shatter an entire worldview.
  8. You have to put truth above comfort and relationships; that is what following God is.
20 opinions in the discussion 19 participants, 9 replies to each other The opinion with the most support I never understood how people can still be Protestant nowadays, Google exists Read the discussion
87 comments at the source Original on Instagram

Discussion Β· 20

Opinions are anonymous retellings of real comments from the original discussion. The same colour marks the same participant.

Log in Log in or sign up to join the discussion.

  • opinion#2286

    I never understood how people can still be Protestant nowadays, Google exists

    • opinion#2292

      Google is gonna tell me what exactly? The Scriptures are what led me to be Protestant. Saying I'm just prideful for not leaving is a pretty low response. This is exactly why we struggle to have real discussions these days and why our positions are where they are.

    • opinion#2293

      The Scriptures were recognized by the early church. They didn't create the canon, they recognized what was already being taught as divine Scripture. And if you think Protestants are against the early church, we're not at all, we actually hold to their teachings and recognize their authority. But they aren't infallible, only Scripture is. And I can ask the same question right back about which branch of Orthodoxy.

    • opinion#2294

      So the church can decide an infallible canon but can't do anything else infallibly? You guys don't follow the fathers, you just quote mine saints (notably St. Augustine) and run with that. The fathers never taught any of the solas, PSA, etc lol.

  • opinion#2291

    He's not convinced he needs to convert from Protestantism? So did the gates of hades prevail against the church Christ established?

    • opinion#2295

      Brother, the sacred heart is catholic, created by a weirdo catholic nun and it's Nestorian.

    • opinion#2296

      yeah with all due respect you might want to change that PFP

    • opinion#2297

      yeah I might switch it too many ppl been saying no sacred heart

    • opinion#2298

      that has never been a concern for protestants because they view all believers gathered in His name as the Church. most don't realize that it was the "Ekklesia" Church (Government Structure) that was built on Peter-not the "body of believers" Church. and as a former protestant, they frankly have a lot of scripture they cite to support the idea of a Multifaceted Church. Of course no early Christians believed this and once you recognize it it is game over for the Protestant Religion

    • opinion#2299

      yea bro don't trip, the sacred heart is just heresy, good catch tho

  • opinion#2290

    There is but one paradigm, and the hardest part of accepting it is swallowing your ego and submitting to it.

  • opinion#2289

    Cafeteria Christians stop being "Christian" when your worldview is Frankensteined together from reformers, Orthodox Fathers, and modern theologians who all call each other heretics. A Jehovah's witness isn't suddenly "Christian" because he uses some Orthodox theology and says Christ is God, while also claiming Christ spiritually came back in the 19th century for the second coming.

    • opinion#2300

      thank you!!!! This! I followed his page for a little while then saw him speak his Protestant views but before say the Orthodox Jesus prayer before he started speaking. I unfollowed him when I realized he cherry picks from different churches when he speaks. I like the term Cafeteria Christian. πŸ‘ πŸ‘

  • opinion#2288

    "I'm yet to be convinced" ok so literally just Google it. You have to be baptized into 1 church to be a Christian. If you're unbaptised you don't get communion. Therefore you aren't a Christian.

  • opinion#2285

    It'd be awesome if you could make a list with book links for inquirers.

  • opinion#2287

    Does he realize worldviews are systems? If he gets convinced of one point, then the problem is likely systemic. That just necessarily follows. Basic logic, and people either can't grasp it or are too lazy to look further.

  • opinion#2283

    The "Lord's Giant", Benjamin, is earnest and genuine. His heart and mind are in the right place and his faith is real. He's a Protestants' Protestant through and through. With so many people being flimsy and fake, he's honestly a breath of fresh air for the lost. Lord have mercy on him and on me. But then which ethnic church does a prot convert to? Russian, Serbian, Greek, Ethiopian, or the many others? What about the Copts? Should we follow Egypt? Who and what is the correct orthodox church?

  • opinion#2281

    I like Giant, but honestly I don't think he's being honest with himself. Lol. Right now I'm listening to a podcast on the Eucharist with an Anglican priest, and the fact that even Anglicans apparently can't agree 100% on what it is just confuses me. It's basically made up my mind that I'm going Orthodox.

  • opinion#2282

    Genuine question: Orthodoxy rejects catholic teachings, but Eastern Catholicism keeps the Orthodox theological praxis while accepting the Pope as St. Peter's apostolic successor. From what I've seen, a disunified body of Christ, and people practicing things outside what the body accepts, doesn't lose faith or salvation, only the fullness of Christ and the faith. So how does Orthodoxy keep the fullness of faith while rejecting St. Peter's successor, especially since the Orthodox Church accepted that succession up until the 8th Ecumenical Council?

  • opinion#2284

    Sure, someone can always rework these concepts to fit a new worldview, but I think that itself is a defeater and makes protestantism relativistic. Also, Orthodox Ecclesiology is really the final blow that sinks every other worldview. If there was one single exclusivist institutional body from the Early Church Era, protestantism can't be true. Actually, neither can RC or the Orientals.