WeOrthodox
EN UA
Eastern Orthodoxy Daily He/Who/Is Instagram

Unitarianism functionally polytheistic despite monotheistic claims

The post argues that Unitarian theology, while professing one God, assigns divine roles to Jesus as a creature, making it functionally polytheistic. The author states that praying to Jesus as "first of all creation" is still praying to a creature, and invoking that creature for salvation assigns it a divine role, elevating it to a lesser deity.

By Islamic standards this constitutes shirk regardless of Unitarian insistence on monotheism. From a traditional Christian perspective, worship belongs only to God; if Jesus is treated as spiritually essential while being denied divinity, religious reliance is placed on a creature. This issue is exactly what early Christians like St. Athanasius argued against when confronting Arian theology.

Jewish critiques come from a different angle: Judaism guards divine unity strictly, so assigning cosmic roles like judgment, mediation, or salvation to a human figure feels like adding another participant into God's authority. Even if technically subordinate, elevating a man into divine function crosses the boundary of pure monotheism.

Philosophically, the author distinguishes between saying there is one God and actually living as if only one ultimate reality exists. A belief system can claim one divine being in theory while in practice spreading devotion across multiple sacred centers. The author concludes that Unitarianism keeps monotheism as an idea but functionally drifts into something that looks more like polytheism in how devotion, authority, and meaning get divided when Christ gets involved.

To Muslims who favor Unitarians, the author promises that Unitarian theology would constitute shirk in Islam because Jesus is not a human or prophet in their theology but far beyond that.

Main points

  • Praying to Jesus as first of creation directs worship to a creature
  • Traditional Christianity requires Christ's divinity for spiritual reliance
  • St. Athanasius opposed similar Arian theology in the early Church
  • Judaism rejects assigning divine functions to a human figure
  • Islam would classify Unitarian devotion to Jesus as shirk
4 opinions in the discussion 4 participants, 2 replies to each other The opinion with the most support I'd like to see this same diagram done for the Catholic Filioque. What exactly about the structure of the Trinity gets broken by adding it? Read the discussion
11 comments at the source Original on Instagram

Discussion · 4

Opinions are anonymous retellings of real comments from the original discussion. The same colour marks the same participant.

Log in Log in or sign up to join the discussion.

  • opinion#2180

    I'd like to see this same diagram done for the Catholic Filioque. What exactly about the structure of the Trinity gets broken by adding it?

  • opinion#2179

    It depends which Unitarians you mean. The original ones here in Transylvania follow something like a mix of Christianity and Islam with a bit of humanist Atheism mixed in: they see Jesus as the best of men and a prophet, treat the resurrection as symbolic, and hold that the Holy Spirit isn't a person at all, just some divine power. If the filioque bothers you, you really don't want to see what they did to the text of the Creed...

    • opinion#2181

      Huh, I had no idea the Universalist Unitarianism had spread that far. Do they do the "Gender Affirming" thing too?

    • opinion#2182

      Our Unitarians have existed since the 16th century and are generally more conservative. The UUs formed separately in the USA, though once the two groups came into contact they did influence our theology over time. The gender stuff wasn't around when I was in contact with them, so I can't say, it may have changed since then.