WeOrthodox
EN UA
St Anthony’s Youth SA ☦︎ Instagram

The Bible belongs to the Church, not to private interpretation

Christ did not hand us a Bible and tell each person to interpret it as he sees fit. He founded His Church, entrusted authority to the Apostles, and pledged that the Holy Spirit would lead her into all truth (John 16:13).

The New Testament itself arose from inside the life of this Church. Long before the New Testament was completely written, copied, gathered, and acknowledged, Christians were already worshipping, baptizing, celebrating the Eucharist, ordaining bishops, and guarding the apostolic faith.

That is why Saint Paul describes the Church as "the pillar and foundation of the truth" (1 Timothy 3:15). He also urges believers to "stand firm and hold to the traditions" they received, whether "by word of mouth or by letter" (2 Thessalonians 2:15). The apostolic faith was therefore passed down both in writing and through the living Tradition of the Church.

We see this same principle in Scripture itself. When the Ethiopian eunuch was reading Isaiah and was asked if he understood it, he replied, "How can I, unless someone guides me?" (Acts 8:31). And when a serious doctrinal disagreement arose in the early Church, Christians did not simply tell everyone to read the Bible and decide for themselves.

The Apostles and elders met together in Jerusalem, discerned the truth, and announced, "It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us" (Acts 15:28).

This does not mean Scripture is unimportant or that Christians should not read the Bible. The Orthodox Church honors Holy Scripture as the inspired Word of God. But Scripture was never meant to be cut off from the Church, the Apostolic Tradition, the Fathers, the Councils, and the worshiping life in which it was received and preserved.

The issue is not "Bible or Church." The Bible belongs to the Church.

Christ gave us neither private interpretation nor thousands of contradictory versions of Christianity. He gave us one Church, one faith, one baptism (Ephesians 4:4-5), and within that Church the Scriptures are read according to the apostolic faith handed down from generation to generation.

Main points

  • Christ established the Church with apostolic authority and promised the Holy Spirit's guidance, not private Bible interpretation.
  • The New Testament emerged from within the Church's life, which already worshipped, baptized, celebrated the Eucharist, and ordained bishops before the canon was settled.
  • Scripture itself shows the need for guidance (Ethiopian eunuch) and conciliar decision-making (Jerusalem Council).
  • The Orthodox Church venerates Scripture as inspired but insists it cannot be separated from the Church, Tradition, Fathers, Councils, and worship.
  • Christ gave one Church, one faith, one baptism, within which Scripture is read according to the apostolic faith handed down.
12 opinions in the discussion 7 participants, 9 replies to each other The opinion with the most support Where does it say he gave us the church to interpret the bible. Or did the orthodox interpret that the church is the only one who can interpret the bible? Read the discussion
46 comments at the source Original on Instagram

Discussion · 12

Opinions are anonymous retellings of real comments from the original discussion. The same colour marks the same participant.

Log in Log in or sign up to join the discussion.

  • opinion#801

    Where does it say he gave us the church to interpret the bible. Or did the orthodox interpret that the church is the only one who can interpret the bible?

    • opinion#802

      1 Timothy 3:15, the Church is the pillar and foundation of Truth. Not any one man or his interpretation.

    • opinion#803

      You have that in the book of Acts. Read the bible further

    • opinion#804

      "but if I am delayed, I write so that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth." I Timothy 3:15 NKJV

    • opinion#805

      That was referring to the ancient church however that doesn't say the church is the only one who can interpret the Bible.

    • opinion#806

      Where else other than the pillar and ground of truth would I be going to get the correct interpretation on the Holy scriptures? (Mind you the same pillar and ground of truth that gave you the scriptures in the first place.)

    • opinion#807

      The scriptures already existed way before the church was formed. I'm not attacking orthodoxy, I'm actually being drawn to orthodoxy, however the emphasis on saint worship or like you call it veneration or praying to them / icons and sacraments seem to go before the written word. There should be a better argument to justify only the church with fallible men can interpret an infallible bible.

    • opinion#808

      The church went 300 years without a compiled "Bible", you just made a historically inaccurate statement. Lol. Lord have mercy. To reject the church that Christ established is to reject Christ Himself

    • opinion#809

      Christ didn't establish the Orthodox Church. Catholicism came in 380 AD which was really the new Roman Empire headed by the pope. Those are just historical facts. What Catholicism and orthodoxy did, putting tradition before the written word, is almost what the Pharisees did with the law of Moses and tradition. Anytime someone makes any argument you guys are quick to call it heresy or that we're rejecting Christ. Worshipping saints and Mary is not biblical, the Bible makes that very clear and it does not need interpretation. All I'm saying is that just because traditionally something was done does not make it right. Salvation is by faith in Jesus only, not by sacraments or works like you guys believe

  • opinion#800

    We are the Church. Fellowship over the word can happen anywhere

    • opinion#810

      "There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism;" Ephesians 4:4-5. Only the Orthodox Church can claim to be Christ's Body.

  • opinion#799

    No he didn't. That's a very specific claim, and unless we were all there to confirm it, it's just word of mouth even if it was handed down traditionally. How would I know it's true apart from you telling me to trust you? Show me. I already believe in Jesus as Son of God and resurrected, so my faith shouldn't be questioned. My issue is with the claim itself. How do you prove it? The claim demands evidence, not faith.