WeOrthodox
EN UA
Kyle YouTube

Do Jews, Muslims, and Christians Worship the Same God? An Orthodox Case for Saying No

Do Jews, Muslims, and Christians Worship the Same God? An Orthodox Case for Saying No 7:47

What the video says

The video argues against the modern 'Abrahamic faiths' idea that Judaism, Islam, and Christianity all worship the same God, calling this a denial of the gospel. The speaker offers a simple test—pointing at an icon of Christ and asking if that is one's God—and insists that rejecting the Son means rejecting the Father, citing John 2. He critiques rabbinic Judaism as a later invention, describes Islam's conception of Allah from the Quran, and compares these to other movements like Mormonism and the Bahá'í faith that reinvent old heresies.

He grounds his argument in Scripture, the church fathers, and Old Testament theophanies, claiming trinitarian theology is present in the Old Testament and that only Christianity has continuity with it.

Key moments

  1. The 'Abrahamic religions worship the same God' idea is false and a denial of the gospel; the test is asking whether the icon of Christ is one's God.
  2. Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father (John 2); modern Jews who reject Christ do not worship the same God as Christians.
  3. There is no dual covenant theology; the old covenant was preparatory and fulfilled in Christ, and the Church is the new Israel, not modern rabbinic Judaism (invented in the 600s).
  4. In John 8, Jesus tells the Pharisees their father is the devil; rabbinic Judaism follows the Pharisees' tradition.
  5. Islam, arising 600 years after Christianity, describes Allah with body parts (a shin, two right hands, one eye), never as Father, and denies Jesus's divinity and crucifixion—so it worships a different God.
  6. Denying Christ's divinity is Arianism, condemned at the First Ecumenical Council; the church fathers held that Arians do not worship the one God.
  7. Old Testament theophanies (the angel of the Lord, Daniel 7, the 'two powers in heaven' idea) show trinitarian theology was present in the Old Testament.
  8. Mormonism reinvents tritheism (three beings united in purpose, not essence), and the Bahá'í faith treats Jesus as merely one manifestation among many—none worship the same God.

This video challenges the popular notion of 'Abrahamic faiths' worshiping one and the same God, arguing that this framing amounts to a denial of the gospel. The speaker proposes a simple test: point to an icon of Christ and ask whether that is your God. Since whoever denies the Son does not have the Father (citing 1 John 2), he concludes that those who reject Christ's divinity do not worship the God Christians worship.

He then examines rabbinic Judaism, describing it as a later development from Pharisaic tradition rather than the religion of the Old Testament, and rejects dual-covenant theology, holding that the Church is the new Israel. Turning to Islam, he argues that the Quran describes Allah in anthropomorphic terms, never as Father, and denies Christ's divinity and crucifixion—placing it, in his view, alongside Arianism, which the First Ecumenical Council condemned.

He claims trinitarian theology is already present in Old Testament theophanies, such as the angel of the Lord and Daniel 7. Finally, he extends the argument to Mormonism (a revival of tritheism) and the Bahá'í faith (which treats Jesus as one manifestation among many). The comment section became a lively debate. Supporters cited St. John of Damascus, Galatians 1:8, and Vatican II's Lumen Gentium—some noting that Rome's declaration that Muslims 'adore the one God' illustrates the very error being critiqued.

Critics pushed back on philosophical grounds, arguing that calling Arians 'wrong about Christ' presupposes a shared referent, so error about God still implies reference to the same God. Others raised the Hebraic concept of agency (shlichut) regarding the Angel of the Lord, objected to harsh language about the Jewish people—pointing to the Theotokos and the saints who were Jews—or cautioned the speaker to examine whether pride, not Christ, motivated the video.

Main points

  • The video rejects the 'same God' framing for Judaism, Islam, and Christianity, using the test of whether the icon of Christ is one's God.
  • Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father; rabbinic Judaism and Islam are described as later developments that reject Christ's divinity.
  • Islam's Allah is described anthropomorphically and never as Father; denying Christ's divinity parallels the Arianism condemned at Nicaea.
  • Commenters debated philosophical reference theory, Vatican II's Lumen Gentium, and the 'angel of the Lord' as an agent (shaliach) rather than God himself.
  • Some commenters cautioned against harsh rhetoric toward Jews and Muslims, urging humility over polemics.
241 comments at the source 26K views Original on YouTube

Discussion · 22

Opinions are anonymous retellings of real comments from the original discussion. The same colour marks the same participant.

Log in Log in or sign up to join the discussion.

  • opinion#355

    Mormonism is pure heresy. I grew up in that faith but eventually escaped during a semester abroad in Russia, where I encountered Eastern Orthodoxy — partly through reading Dostoevsky. In my view, Joseph Smith and Mohammed both believed they had met an angel of God, but it was really some kind of demon whose aim was to pull people away from the King of kings through these deceptive, false religions. ☦️

  • opinion#363

    Do Christians and Muslims worship the same God? No. Galatians 1:8 — even if we or an angel from heaven preaches a gospel different from the one we preached, let him be accursed! Christians hold the Holy Trinity to be the one true God; Muslims believe in the oneness of Allah. Therefore, we do not worship the same God.

  • opinion#356

    St. John of Damascus saw Islam as a heretical offshoot of Christianity, but truthfully Islam's foundations are a blend of Judaism, Nestorian Christianity, and Arabic paganism. It's really worship of the old Arabic pagan moon deity. The Baha'i faith is essentially a universalized Islam, like Sufism pushed even further.

  • opinion#357

    The dogmatic constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium 16, from Vatican II, states: the plan of salvation includes those who acknowledge the Creator, first among them the Muslims, who profess the faith of Abraham and together with us adore the one, merciful God, judge of mankind on the last day. According to the Roman Catechism, adoration corresponds to the Greek λατρεία (latria), the highest worship given to God alone as the infinitely perfect Creator and Lord. So the Latins claim they worship the same god as Muslims alongside them. That's far worse than the filioque: Muslims deny the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Kyrie eleison.

  • opinion#365

    It's amusing watching people engage in this kind of ecumenism. Yes, we're Abrahamic religions (descended from Abraham), but we don't share one faith, nor do we worship the same god. Different formulations of who God is mean we have ontologically different Gods.

  • opinion#367

    We worship the same divine essence. But without faith in Christ, Muslims and Jews are damned.

  • opinion#358

    Were the Arians wrong about Christ? This is a basic logical point about how reference works. To claim "X is wrong about Y," the Y must be a shared referent. Saying the Arians were wrong about Christ (i.e., heretics) means they point to the same Christ you do. Likewise, to say Judaism or Islam are wrong about God, they must be referring to that same referent.

  • opinion#369

    If you worship one god in trinity, you're worshipping a non-Biblical, pagan-influenced Greco-Roman construct. The Athanasian Creed underpins Christendom's triune godhead, yet it appears nowhere in Scripture and didn't exist until the First Council of Constantinople in 381 CE. Every author of what we call the Bible was Hebrew — not Greek, and certainly not Roman.

  • opinion#370

    CHRISTIANITY: "Three-in-One": A rock is a single being, but it has no personhood inside that being. Personhood means the capacity to think, reason, and be consciously aware of yourself. A rock has no reference point, no center of consciousness to do any of that — it's like "zero persons in one being." A man is one being with one personhood: one reference point, one center of consciousness for thinking, reasoning, and self-awareness — "one person in one being." God is one Being containing three distinct Personhoods — three reference points, three Centers of Consciousness within Himself — making Him "three Persons in one Being." * In all of existence, God alone is unlike anything else. Everything else is either rock-like (one being, zero personhood) or man-like (one being, one personhood). Satan, angels, humans, Allah, demons, birds, fish — all of us are like the man: a single reference point within ourselves. * God alone has three Personhoods within His Oneness — He alone is "Three-Persons-in-One-Being." Over 2,000 years ago, the "Word of God," Himself one of the three Persons, took on human flesh through the Virgin Mary and walked among us. The New Testament writers put it this way: "We saw Him — the One who existed with God before creation; we touched Him; we ate with Him. His glory surpassed every human who ever lived or will live. He died for our sins, and three days later…

  • opinion#364

    As a Catholic Christian who believes the God of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam is the same God, I disagree. You claimed these religions don't worship the same God, that rejecting the Son means rejecting the Father, that rabbinic Judaism and Islam were both invented in the 600s, that Allah has a shin and two right hands, and that the Trinity is the only way to worship the God of Abraham. Your argument fails — not because I'm a Muslim or Jew, I'm Catholic — but because the logic doesn't hold. First, you equivocate on "same God," treating it as "same theology about God." Those differ: two people can refer to the same person while disagreeing about his attributes. If I say Lincoln was tall and you say short, it's still the same Lincoln. So you've shown Jews and Muslims have a different understanding of God, not a different God. Second, you beg the question: quoting 1 John 2:22-23 assumes the Trinitarian definition is correct, but Jews and Muslims don't accept it as authoritative. You're using Christian premises to prove a Christian conclusion — circular. Third, a false dilemma: defining "same God" so only Trinitarians qualify is gatekeeping, a No True Scotsman move, not an argument. Fourth, a genetic fallacy: origin dates don't determine whether religions refer to the same God — Christianity also emerged after Judaism, so by that logic it too wouldn't worship the God of…

  • opinion#371

    There is nothing like Him; He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing. Allah—Glory and Exaltation be to Him—is neither a body nor matter; whatever you imagine, Allah is unlike that. You cannot hold Islam as a whole accountable for the erroneous ideas held by certain Islamic groups. Just as I cannot judge Christianity based on the doctrines of the Mormon or Protestant churches.

  • opinion#374

    I am a Muslim, a follower of the final prophet, Muhammad. The Torah, the Psalms (Zabur), the Gospel (Injil), and the Quran are the words of Allah. Muslims worship the same God as Abraham did. Surah Al-Ikhlas [112]: In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. 1. Say, "He is Allah, [who is] One, 2. Allah, the Eternal Refuge. 3. He neither begets nor is born, 4. Nor is there to Him any equivalent." Jesus, son of Mary, is a prophet. He was born of a virgin mother. He was not crucified — God raised him to His side. He will return, and he is the Messiah. Surah An-Nisa [4]: 156. and for their denial and outrageous accusation against Mary, 157. and for boasting, "We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah." But they neither killed nor crucified him — it was only made to appear so. Those who argue for the 'crucifixion' are in doubt. They have no real knowledge — only assumptions. They certainly did not kill him. 158. Rather, Allah raised him up to Himself. And Allah is Almighty, All-Wise. 159. Every one of the People of the Book will definitely believe in him before his death. And on the Day of Judgment Jesus will be a witness against them.

  • opinion#375

    Only as a referent, never in essence. Someone can refer to God yet fail to grasp the fullness of His essence, which leaves them without comprehension of true divine revelation. This is the official Catholic position. Muslims, in a sense, do not worship the same God — but that has nothing to do with the referent. The same applies to the Jews. Don't mistake us for claiming we worship the same God in sense or in essence. Moreover, because they reject God in essence and lack the fullness of truth, their salvation and souls are at risk. St John of Damascus, De Haeresibus (PG 94, 767); Pope Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris, 72 (1937); St Robert Bellarmine, Controversies of the Christian Faith, Book 3, On the Interpretation of the Word of God, ch. 10, p 207; St Augustine, De Vera Religione, IX (PL 34, 127); St Gregory of Nyssa, De Spiritu Sancto Adversus Pneumatomachos Mecedonianos, 15 (PG 45, 1319); Romans 1:19-21, 1 Corinthians 10:16-21, Acts 17:38 (Open for Dialogue)

  • opinion#359

    🤦‍♂️ There's a concept running throughout the Bible that most Christians rarely know or teach: the Hebraic practice of "shlichut" (agency). The "Angel of the Lord" was a designated agent (a "shaliach") of God and could be called by the sender's name (God) without literally being God. Christ points to this repeatedly in John's Gospel. The Hebrew verb "to send" is "shalach," so every time Christ says he was SENT, he's declaring himself a shaliach of God. John 12:44: "Whoever believes in me believes not in me but in HIM WHO SENT ME." John 4:34: "My food is to do the will of THE ONE WHO SENT ME." John 8:42: "I have not come from myself, but THAT ONE SENT ME." John 5:30: "I can do nothing from myself... I do not seek my own will but the will of THE ONE WHO SENT ME." John 7:16: "MY TEACHING IS NOT MINE but HIS WHO SENT ME." John 12:49: "The Father himself who SENT me has commanded me what to say."

  • opinion#360

    Why would Jews be the most unworthy people? Unless I'm mistaken, the Mother of God, the Theotokos, was Jewish, as was St. John the Baptist, plus so many saints and prophets. How can they be the most unworthy given all these hugely important and holy figures?

  • opinion#361

    All Christians who believe Jesus Christ is literally God should really meditate on Christ's words here: Matthew 7:21-23 (CEB) — "Not everybody who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven. ONLY THOSE WHO DO THE WILL OF MY FATHER IN HEAVEN WILL ENTER. On Judgment Day many will say, 'Lord, Lord, didn't we prophesy in your name, expel demons in your name, and do many miracles in your name?' Then I'll tell them, 'I never knew you. Get away from me, you who do wrong.'"

  • opinion#362

    If they say they worship the same "God" as Muslims and Jews, who am I to deny it? But if they do worship the same God as Muslims and Jews, then they cannot be worshipping the One True God.

  • opinion#366

    Watch what you preach, brother — does this post really serve Christ? What do you hope to accomplish by posting it? To humiliate others? Ask yourself what's driving you: pride and vainglory, or Christ? Be careful, because you and MANY others can lead inquirers and catechumens astray, ultimately working against the Church.

  • opinion#368

    So modern Jews worship a different god than ancient Jews, and the ancient Jews worshipped the same God, but today's Jews think they're worshipping the original version while actually following a skewed one. Does that mean they're worshipping a skewed version, or are they making an idol?

  • opinion#372

    All three Abrahamic religions do worship the same God, yet each has its own separate and distinct covenant. Beyond the covenants differing from one another, each community also has its own distinct history of preserving and interpreting its scriptures and traditions. Unfortunately, every one of them has also been damaged by manmade politics along the way… 😔

  • opinion#373

    In my personal view, ecumenism is the heresy of our era and genuinely a sign of the end times. In the past, at least people disagreed with one another for the sake of what is true — truth and falsehood were clearly divided. Now it's all about unity at the expense of truth.

  • opinion#376

    Muslims worship the same God as Christians in object, not in concept. Before you call it a quantifier shift fallacy — it would only be one if multiple One True Gods actually existed, and since they don't, the fallacy doesn't apply. Jay once tried to demonstrate it was a quantifier shift fallacy with an example: you have a mother, I have a mother, therefore we share the same mother. The flaw in that, as I said, is that many mothers really do exist, so the fallacy works there — but not with the One True God, of whom there is only one. Nobody is claiming Muslims have salvation, or that they have the Father without the Son. They are, however, first in THE PLAN of salvation: they already believe God is One and is the God of Abraham, which puts them closer to salvation than, say, an atheist.