Eastern Orthodoxy Daily He/Who/Is — Instagram

Prayer Orthodoxy ® with Eastern Orthodoxy Daily He/Who/Is, ☦️An Orthodox Blog☦️ Instagram 3 hours ago

Once a sheep of the world, now His: a short confession of faith

The author writes a short personal confession about leaving behind the desire to fit in with the crowd. They state that they no longer follow the crowd but follow Christ, and that they no longer seek acceptance from people but acceptance from Him. The author adds that they no longer live for this world but live for His Kingdom, and describes their former life as having been a sheep of the world, in contrast to belonging to Christ now. The post…

The author writes a short personal confession about leaving behind the desire to fit in with the crowd. They state that they no longer follow the crowd but follow Christ, and that they no longer seek acceptance from people but acceptance from Him. The author adds that they no longer live for this world but live for His Kingdom, and describes their former life as having been a sheep of the world, in contrast to belonging to Christ now.

The post closes with the word Amen and a set of symbols, including a cross. There is no discussion in the thread; the post is a single statement of personal commitment with no replies, questions, or further context given. The language is direct and declarative throughout, built on a series of contrasts: crowd versus Christ, acceptance by people versus acceptance by Him, this world versus His Kingdom, being the world's sheep versus being His.

The author no longer follows the crowd but follows Christ.
They seek acceptance from Christ rather than from people.
They say they no longer live for this world but for His Kingdom.
They describe their former self as a sheep of the world and now as belonging to Christ.
The post is a single statement of faith with no discussion or replies.

Fourteen Orthodox Churches and a Catechism That Isn't for Everyone

The speaker, an Orthodox Christian, opens by saying he is tired of a certain style of Catholic apologetics, which he calls papal slop apologetics. He then makes a structural argument about church organization. In his view there is no single Eastern Orthodox Church; there are 14, one for each patriarch, each with its own structure. He sets this against the Catholic side, where the Catechism of the Catholic Church, promulgated by John Paul II,…

The speaker, an Orthodox Christian, opens by saying he is tired of a certain style of Catholic apologetics, which he calls papal slop apologetics. He then makes a structural argument about church organization. In his view there is no single Eastern Orthodox Church; there are 14, one for each patriarch, each with its own structure.

He sets this against the Catholic side, where the Catechism of the Catholic Church, promulgated by John Paul II, functions as a common reference text. He argues that the book's title is misleading and that it should be called the catechism of the Roman Catholic Church, since it is written for Roman Catholic readers rather than for all Catholics.

The speaker anticipates the objection that Catholics are bound to accept the catechism as authoritative over other sources of teaching, and he answers that this is not how Catholics understand themselves or their own tradition. The discussion therefore turns on two questions: how the Orthodox churches are organized in relation to their patriarchs, and how the authority of a catechism works within Catholicism.

The speaker's point is that comparisons between the two traditions often misstate both sides, treating Orthodoxy as one centralized body and treating the catechism as a universal binding code, when in his account neither description matches the self-understanding of the traditions involved. The post is framed as a complaint about apologetics content that, in his view, keeps repeating these inaccuracies.

The speaker says he is tired of Catholic apologetics content, which he calls papal slop apologetics.
He states there is no single Eastern Orthodox Church but 14, one for each patriarch, each with its own structure.
He argues the Catechism of the Catholic Church, promulgated by John Paul II, should be called the catechism of the Roman Catholic Church because it is written for Roman Catholic readers.
He expects objections that Catholics must accept the catechism as binding over other authorities.
He responds that this is not how Catholics understand themselves.

Key moments

0:00 There is no single Eastern Orthodox Church; there are 14, matching the number of patriarchs.
0:00 The Catechism of the Catholic Church was promulgated by John Paul II and should be called the catechism of the Roman Catholic Church, since it is written for Roman Catholic readers.
0:00 The speaker expects objections that Catholics must accept the catechism over other things, and says that is not the Catholic self-understanding.

Unity Without Truth Is Not True Unity

The author argues that Christian unity cannot rest on doctrinal compromise or on the claim that all faiths and teachings are equally true. The Orthodox Church, in this view, is called to preserve the Apostolic Faith, uphold the truth of the Gospel, and remain faithful to what has been handed down through Holy Tradition. The post warns against treating love and unity as reasons to abandon the truth, and closes with the statement that unity…

The author argues that Christian unity cannot rest on doctrinal compromise or on the claim that all faiths and teachings are equally true. The Orthodox Church, in this view, is called to preserve the Apostolic Faith, uphold the truth of the Gospel, and remain faithful to what has been handed down through Holy Tradition. The post warns against treating love and unity as reasons to abandon the truth, and closes with the statement that unity without truth is not true unity.

The text is a short confessional statement rather than a discussion thread: it sets out a position on ecumenism and doctrinal relativism without citing specific events, documents, or dialogues. Its core claims are that truth and unity are inseparable, that compromise on doctrine is a false path to unity, and that fidelity to Holy Tradition takes precedence over agreement at any cost.

Christian unity cannot be built on doctrinal compromise or on the belief that all faiths are equally true.
The Orthodox Church is called to preserve the Apostolic Faith and the truth of the Gospel.
Fidelity to the teachings handed down through Holy Tradition is presented as a duty.
Love and unity must not become excuses for abandoning the truth.
The author concludes that unity without truth is not true unity.