WeOrthodox
EN UA

How Three Can Be One: The Trinity Without Contradiction

What the video says

A questioner asks whether the Trinity, three co-equal and co-eternal persons, can really be one God. The answer explains that the Trinity only sounds contradictory when defined badly: the Church does not say God is one person and three persons, or one God and three Gods, but one divine essence existing in three hypostases. The persons are distinguished by their relations of origin: the Father is the one Arche, the source and cause, the Son is eternally begotten of the Father, and the Holy Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father.

They are not divided in will, essence, power, or energy, so the distinction is hypostatic, not essential. St. Gregory the Theologian is quoted: the three have one nature, God, and the union is the Father, from whom and to whom the order of the persons runs its course. Monarchy gives the unity and relation gives the distinction, without collapsing the three into one person or splitting God into three.

Key moments

  1. A questioner asks how three co-equal, co-eternal persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, can be one God.
  2. The Trinity only sounds contradictory if defined badly; the Church affirms one divine essence in three hypostases, not one person and three persons or one God and three Gods.
  3. The Father is the one Arche, the source and cause within the Godhead.
  4. The Son is eternally begotten of the Father, and the Holy Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father; the persons are distinguished by relations of origin.
  5. The persons are not divided in will, essence, power, or energy; the distinction is hypostatic, not essential.
  6. St. Gregory the Theologian says the three have one nature, God, and the union is the Father, from whom and to whom the order of the persons runs its course.
  7. Monarchy gives the unity and relation gives the distinction, without collapsing the three into one person or splitting God into three.

A questioner asks how the Trinity, three co-equal and co-eternal persons, can really be one God. The answer states that the Trinity only sounds contradictory when it is defined badly. The Church does not say God is one person and three persons, or one God and three Gods.

It affirms one divine essence existing in three hypostases. The persons are distinguished by their relations of origin. The Father is the one Arche, the source and cause within the Godhead. The Son is eternally begotten of the Father, and the Holy Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father.

The three are not divided in will, essence, power, or energy, so the distinction between them is hypostatic, not essential. St. Gregory the Theologian is quoted: the three have one nature, God, and the union is the Father, from whom and to whom the order of the persons runs its course. The discussion turns on how unity and distinction are held together.

Monarchy gives the unity, and relation gives the distinction. This holds without collapsing the three into one person or splitting God into three separate beings. The reply stays within classical trinitarian terminology: essence, hypostasis, begetting, procession, and monarchy of the Father.

The questioner's puzzle dissolves once the terms are used precisely, since the alleged contradiction comes from mixing categories of person and essence. The answer closes on the same point it opened with: the Church's formulation avoids both errors, the one that merges the persons and the one that divides the Godhead.

Main points

  • The Trinity sounds contradictory only when defined badly: the Church affirms one divine essence in three hypostases, not one person and three persons.
  • The Father is the one Arche, the source and cause; the Son is eternally begotten of him and the Holy Spirit eternally proceeds from him.
  • The persons are distinguished by relations of origin, not divided in will, essence, power, or energy.
  • St. Gregory the Theologian: the three have one nature, God, and the union is the Father, from whom and to whom the order of the persons runs its course.
  • Monarchy gives the unity and relation gives the distinction, without collapsing the three into one person or splitting God into three.
10 opinions in the discussion 10 participants, 2 replies to each other The opinion with the most support The Nicene Creed lays it out too. I believe in ONE God the Father Almighty. The son is begotten and the spirit proceeds. So the son and the spirit share the same divine characteristics. Therefore God is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Read the discussion
38 comments at the source Original on Instagram

Discussion · 10

Opinions are anonymous retellings of real comments from the original discussion. The same colour marks the same participant.

Log in Log in or sign up to join the discussion.

  • opinion#1664

    The Nicene Creed lays it out too. I believe in ONE God the Father Almighty. The son is begotten and the spirit proceeds. So the son and the spirit share the same divine characteristics. Therefore God is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

  • opinion#1663

    The people pushing this argument don't even know what "person" means in relation to the Trinity, let alone how to define it.

  • opinion#1661

    and what about the Son?

    • opinion#1665

      no, we go by what 6 of the 7 ecumenical councils used, and they never once had the filioque clause

    • opinion#1666

      the Filioque doesn't change the creed. It affirms the Trinity just like the council of Nicaea focused on Christ's divinity, and the council of Toledo accepted the council of Constantinople.

  • opinion#1662

    Islam literally teaches that Allah has uncreated attributes like a foot, hand and face without treating them as separate gods, so having distinctions doesn't automatically mean believing in multiple gods☦️🙏

  • opinion#1658

    The best explanation of the trinity I've come across is: God is love. Not that God HAS love or that love is just one attribute among others, but that love names the very essence of what God is. So in his own "life", God has to be an interplay of lover (father), beloved (son), and shared love (holy spirit).

  • opinion#1659

    "I don't get it so it must be wrong" is such a strange argument.

  • opinion#1660

    Why would anyone expect GOD to be simple 😂

  • opinion#1657

    The way I put it is: my hand is my hand, it's me but it's also not all of me. Same with my head, it's me but not all of me. I have one body but I'm made of parts, and all those parts together make one me.