WeOrthodox
EN UA
Disgruntled Docs with TimothyNegrete Instagram

Luther Added 'Faith Alone' to Romans 3:28

What the video says

Protestants not only removed books from the Bible but also added words to Scripture. In Romans 3:28, Luther added the phrase 'faith alone' to the text. In the Greek, 'faith alone' appears only in James, where it says we are not saved by faith alone.

The speaker argues that if salvation by faith alone were true, Luther would not have needed to change the text to prove it. We must return to the apostolic faith and not let one man determine the canon; that belongs to the reception of the entire Church.

Key moments

  1. Protestants removed books from the Bible and also added words to Scripture.
  2. Luther added the words 'faith alone' to Romans 3:28.
  3. In the Greek, 'faith alone' appears only in James, which says we are not saved by faith alone.
  4. If we are saved by faith alone, Luther would not have had to change the text to prove it.
  5. We must return to the apostolic faith and not let one man determine the canon, but the reception of the entire Church.

The speaker argues that the Protestant Reformation changed Scripture in two ways: by removing books from the Bible and by adding words to the biblical text. The key example given is Romans 3:28, where Martin Luther added the phrase 'faith alone' to his German translation, even though the phrase does not appear in the Greek text of Paul's letter.

The speaker points out that in the Greek New Testament, the phrase 'faith alone' appears only once, in the Epistle of James, where it says the opposite of what Luther's addition implies: that a person is not saved by faith alone. From this the speaker draws a conclusion: if salvation by faith alone were a biblical teaching, Luther would not have needed to alter the text of Romans in order to prove it.

The change, in the speaker's view, shows that the doctrine required an adjustment of Scripture rather than support from it. The video closes with a call to return to the apostolic faith and a claim about who determines the canon of Scripture. The speaker argues that the canon was not settled by one man, such as Luther, but belongs to the reception of the entire Church.

The hashtags attached to the post indicate the intended audience: Christians generally, with particular reference to Catholicism and Orthodox Christianity. The argument as presented rests on the textual point about Romans 3:28 and the single occurrence of 'faith alone' in James, and it moves from that textual claim to the broader conclusion about Church authority over the canon.

Main points

  • The speaker claims Protestants both removed books from the Bible and added words to Scripture.
  • Luther added the phrase 'faith alone' to Romans 3:28 in his translation.
  • In the Greek, 'faith alone' appears only in James, which says we are not saved by faith alone.
  • The speaker argues that if salvation by faith alone were true, Luther would not have needed to change the text to prove it.
  • The speaker calls for a return to the apostolic faith, saying the canon belongs to the reception of the entire Church, not to one man.
9 opinions in the discussion 7 participants, 6 replies to each other The opinion with the most support Revelation 22:18-19: "warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. 19 And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will… Read the discussion
54 comments at the source Original on Instagram

Discussion · 9

Opinions are anonymous retellings of real comments from the original discussion. The same colour marks the same participant.

Log in Log in or sign up to join the discussion.

  • opinion#1728

    Revelation 22:18-19: "warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. 19 And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll"

  • opinion#1726

    Funny how they act like Catholics never added books of their own or treat the opinions of saints as if they were canonical

    • opinion#1729

      They have. That doesn't address the argument. All you did is admit that your church and their church are both man-made.

    • opinion#1730

      I'm not even a follower of Luther, and no, my church was founded by Christ

    • opinion#1731

      Hahaha you're 1600 years too late brother. Orthodoxy is Christ's Church, not your 17th century spin off

    • opinion#1732

      So are Calvin or Zwingli your church fathers then? Luther removed books, added words to fit his native language and then preached "sola scriptura," which makes no sense. As a former Baptist, don't believe the lies they'll tell you about the one church Christ established. Not the one that came out of a schism 1500 years later.

    • opinion#1733

      No they are not. Sola scriptura is the only way to be consistent

    • opinion#1734

      They are. The very fact you brought up sola scriptura proves it, because it was Luther who invented it. Every single denomination was started by men who couldn't even agree on scripture because of private interpretation. These are hard truths that took me a long time to accept myself. But facts are facts.

  • opinion#1727

    It's not purely a Protestant invention. Some earlier Catholic and patristic writers (Origen, Ambrose, Augustine here and there, Aquinas) used phrasing like "faith alone" when commenting on Paul, though they meant something different than Luther did. Italian and German translations before Luther had similar renderings too. Later Protestant English Bibles mostly didn't copy it. KJV, ESV, NIV and so on don't insert "alone" in Romans 3:28. Tyndale and others kept it out of the text. The only place "faith alone" shows up in the Bible is James 2:24, which says a person is justified by works and "not by faith alone." That's the opposite of how Luther's slogan usually gets used, and it's a big part of the Protestant/Catholic argument. So the fair summary: Luther did add the word in his German translation, openly and with a stated rationale. Whether that was faithful translation or doctrinal insertion is still debated, and which side you land on usually tracks your view of justification itself. I got this from Claude btw