WeOrthodox
EN UA
George Instagram

Why Orthodox Christians Celebrate Christmas on Different Dates

The video explains the historical reason for the 13-day calendar gap between Orthodox churches. At Christ's birth the Roman Empire used the Julian calendar introduced by Julius Caesar, and the apostles and early fathers followed it. That calendar runs about 11 minutes long each year, so over centuries the error accumulated into days.

In 1582 the Pope in Rome removed 10 days to create the Gregorian calendar now used worldwide. Because the Orthodox Church had already separated from Rome, it kept the old calendar. For more than 300 years all Orthodox Christians remained on the Julian calendar until about a century ago when some churches, including Greece and Constantinople, adopted a revised calendar.

Others, including Russia, Serbia, Jerusalem, and Mount Athos, stayed with the original. Today the difference between them is 13 days. Both sides celebrate Christmas on 25 December; they simply count the days differently. The churches remain one church and almost all celebrate Easter on the same day because, as the video states, it is not the calendar that saves us but Christ.

The video traces the calendar from its Roman origin through the apostolic era, the gradual drift caused by the 11-minute annual excess, the papal correction of 1582, the Orthodox refusal to accept that correction, the unity of the Orthodox on the old calendar for over three centuries, the twentieth-century split when some local churches revised the calendar while others did not, and the present reality of a 13-day separation in fixed feasts alongside near-universal agreement on the date of Pascha.

Key moments

  1. The calendar at Jesus' birth was the Julian calendar instituted by Julius Caesar, used by the apostles, the first Christians, and all the church fathers.
  2. The Julian calendar was about 11 minutes too long each year, and over hundreds of years those minutes turned into days of drift.
  3. In 1582 the Pope in Rome cut 10 days out of the calendar to fix the drift, producing the Gregorian calendar that the whole world uses today.
  4. Because the Catholics and the Orthodox had already split, the Orthodox said no to the change and kept the old calendar.
  5. For more than 300 years all Orthodox Christians stayed on the old calendar until about 100 years ago when some churches like Greece and Constantinople decided to fix it too.
  6. Others like Russia, Serbia, Jerusalem, and Mount Athos decided to stay with the old one, and today the difference between them is 13 days.
  7. Both sides celebrate Christmas on the 25th of December; they just count the days a bit differently.
  8. The churches are still one church and almost all celebrate Easter on the same day because in the end it is not the calendar that saves us, it is Christ.
10 opinions in the discussion 10 participants, 2 replies to each other The opinion with the most support The introduction of the Revised Julian calendar in 1924 created an unprecedented liturgical paradox: the complete disappearance of the Apostles' Fast. Before the change, all Orthodox Christians calculated both Pascha and fixed feasts like Saints Peter and… Read the discussion
50 comments at the source Original on Instagram

Discussion · 10

Opinions are anonymous retellings of real comments from the original discussion. The same colour marks the same participant.

Log in Log in or sign up to join the discussion.

  • opinion#3346

    The introduction of the Revised Julian calendar in 1924 created an unprecedented liturgical paradox: the complete disappearance of the Apostles' Fast. Before the change, all Orthodox Christians calculated both Pascha and fixed feasts like Saints Peter and Paul (June 29) on the traditional Julian calendar. Since the two dates moved together, the Apostles' Fast, which starts a variable number of weeks after Pascha but always ends June 28, had a guaranteed minimum of 8 days, even when Pascha fell as late as possible. The New Calendar reform split the system: Gregorian dates for fixed feasts, Julian calculation for Pascha. This hybrid created a structural flaw. When Pascha falls exceptionally late, the calculated start of the fast gets pushed so far forward it lands after June 28. So for New Calendar churches, a late Pascha completely wipes out the fasting period, destroying an ancient liturgical tradition that had never once vanished in the centuries before the change.

  • opinion#3347

    Old Calendar here... When this change was brought in Greece there was an uproar among the people. Most of the clergy wanted the change but the faithful laypeople didn't. Christ eventually showed his approval of the Old Calendar when the first Old Calendar service was held on the Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross on Mount Hymettus in Greece, and a cross of light appeared in the night sky above the church, visible all over Greece, even among the city lights of Ommonia Square in Athens. Christ keeps showing approval for the Old Calendar today by letting us not pay full price for our Easter chocolate.

    • opinion#3349

      Haha, the chocolate point is unbeatable 😄🙏 I've read about the 1925 cross over Hymettus, it's a beautiful and moving account. Whatever calendar we follow, may we all stay united in Christ ❤️☦️

    • opinion#3350

      AMEN... there has been intense and heated debate over it, even on the Holy Mountain. Thankfully we know that both Orthodox Calendars have grace, through the vision our beloved Geronda Iosif Isihastis (aka Joseph the Hesychast) had when he prayed about it while caught between the two.

  • opinion#3348

    LOVE YOUR EXPLANATION, thank you so much for sharing this very informative video with us, all Glory to God!!! which calendar do you follow???

  • opinion#3343

    The new calendar loses major fasting days. I'd like you to look into this and make a video about it. That would be great.

  • opinion#3345

    Just a question, why do you celebrate Easter on the old calendar? Doing that, the feast of the Apostles gets cut short or disappears entirely. Read more, the Fathers of the Church used the old calendar. It's not just about time, it's also about differentiation: don't celebrate with heretics, don't celebrate Easter with the Jews. The old calendar follows this rule without compromise. The Catholic calendar is anathema, first because God settled through the Saints how we keep the holy days, and second because we're never supposed to keep Easter with the Jews. If the dates happen to coincide, which rarely happens on the old calendar, we are commanded to move it a week later. Read the whole context!

  • opinion#3341

    The old one is right. It's the calendar that many Saints followed. Like you said, the Pope changed it first (the Catholics). We need to stay on the right path, and in my opinion the Catholics are not on the right path.

  • opinion#3342

    And then the Pan-Orthodox council anathematised it multiple times... The problem isn't that the new calendar is more "accurate". It's that it breaks liturgical life. All the feasts were already fixed on the old calendar. The whole faith worshipped together and now all of that has been broken for an extra 13 days? No, it's not even for that reason. It's to celebrate at the same time as the western confession, under the goal of a one world religion, which is what the ecumenical movement is pushing. Lord have mercy!

  • opinion#3344

    All I feel is that the Churches need to come together and agree on which calendar to use. We need to be conciliatory, like we have been through the ages, and reach One Mind. It might not end up being either calendar, who knows, but we do need alignment. Hopeful thinking?